Opinion

Who Has the Best Intel? Power Rankings of Governments’ Intelligence Services

In the aftermath of President Trump dismissing the CIA’s conclusion that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, I thought I might do a thought experiment regarding who has the best intelligence service. One could quickly argue the parameters used in this power ranking, but I’m using capability, execution and influence as my big three. I base this assessment on a multitude of meetings with most of those cited. If anyone has a better perspective, please chime in…

The United States of America

One could easily argue that the USA’s technical collection of capability alone sets it far and away above the rest. Next to Britain, Russia and Israel, our human sources are unmatched, and our case officers are as good as it gets. The quality of our intel, in terms of policy influence, is also unmatched, when not influenced by internal politics (i.e., Iraq 2003, Cuba 1962, climate change today). What happened to Radio Free Europe? It’s there somewhere, but not nearly as effective from what I’m seeing lately.

Russia

Russian intelligence existed before we were a country. Their technical capability is not as good as ours, but they are willing to use it when necessary (i.e., the 2016 election). I studied the Soviet propaganda machine in the late 80s and was very impressed with their ability to influence opinions across the globe. It is largely a HUMINT infiltration effort that grew from their success during the Stalin era. Now they use our own technology against us (Facebook) in the best influence campaign the world has ever seen.

The USA did it too, I believe largely to counter the strong Soviet effort in Central and South America, Africa, the Middle East and Europe. The Sovs/Russians get better points for their HUMINT ops, and ability to influence the common Joe.

The United Kingdom

British intelligence existed before the Sovs/Russians. They used to be the best, and still may prove to be the best.  Slightly less technically capable than the U.S. and better than the Sovs/Russians. Glad these guys are on our side. If these guys were a big country like the U.S.A., I believe they could easily be number one.

Israel

I just shake my head at how good the Israeli’s are. Maybe it’s because their country has been threatened every day since it came into existence in 1947. They are a country as big as New Jersey, but they are some of the baddest asses in the world. Their HUMINT is the best in the world.

Germany

If it weren’t for the BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst), Germany’s Foreign Intelligence Service, we would not be nearly as secure as we are today. Great sources, but I wonder sometimes.  I think they hold a lot back. Just my opinion.

France

The General Directorate for External Security (DSGE) is quite capable and a good partner, usually.  They tend to get bogged down in internal politics, in my view. Good technical capability. Always looking for a deal, like the Israelis.

China

The Ministry of State Security (MSS). They’re just big! I admit I don’t know much about these guys. So maybe they should be higher.

So, what’s the point? As we all know, intelligence is provided to decision makers, not to persuade them, but to inform them of the facts and our assessment of those facts, so that they can make the important policy decisions of the day. Should we blockade Cuba? Should we invade Iraq? Should we withdraw from Afghanistan and Syria?  Should we send troops to our southern border to thwart the invaders from Central America?

What our leaders decide to do based upon this intelligence is what makes history. When intelligence is politicized to justify reckless policy decisions, things usually don’t end well: Blockade Cuba? Good. Get stuck in Vietnam? Bad. Invade Grenada? Good. Invade Panama? Good. Invade Afghanistan to kick the crap out of al-Qaeda and the Taliban? Good. Invade Iraq because they supposedly possess weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and are friendly with Osama bin Laden? Really bad. Forget Afghanistan and concentrate on Iraq for five years? Really bad. Drone the crap out of al-Qaeda, Taliban, AQAP, TTP, al-Shabaab, etc? Good

Send troops to repel “invaders” from Central America? Are you kidding me?

The opinions expressed here by contributors are their own and are not the view of OpsLens which seeks to provide a platform for experience-driven commentary on today's trending headlines in the U.S. and around the world. Have a different opinion or something more to add on this topic? Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own experience-driven commentary.
Denny Ross

Dennis Ross is a retired Senior Intelligence Analyst with over 26 years experience with the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. He specialized in Middle East weapons of mass destruction programs and homegrown violent extremism. Ross was the recipient of numerous accolades to include the Director of Central Intelligence, National Medal of Achievement.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

OpsLens Premium on CRTV.

Everywhere, at home or on the go.

SIGNUP NOW